Scaramouche [1952] [Eng] -Hammer71
- Type:
- Video > Movies
- Files:
- 2
- Size:
- 698.62 MiB (732558706 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- Stewart Granger Eleanor Parker Janet Leigh Mel Ferrer fencing
- Uploaded:
- 2008-10-10 07:23:08 GMT
- By:
-
Hammer71
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 2
- Comments
- 5
- Info Hash: C0666BAFE5ED06BDB9D04BB4F4D0113163E1530A
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Scaramouche (1952) Avi Size (MB) .........: 698.62 MB Video Length ..........: 01:54:46 (115 Minutes) Video Codec ...........: XVID (2 Pass) Video Bitrate .........: 819 KB/s (eight-one-nine) Framerate .............: 23.976 FPS Resolution ............: 512 x 384 (Fullscreen) Aspect Ratio ..........: 1.33:1 Audio Codec ...........: (MP3) (MONO) Audio Bitrate .........: 32 KB/s (CBR) Audio Language ........: English CD-R Tested ...........: Memorex CD-R (52x 700mb 80mins) Player Tested .........: Magnavox MWD7006 Surround Sound Test ...: (Not Available - MONO Audio Source) IMDB ..................: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0045125 --------------------------- ---------------------------- Let danger befall him. Let the winds of fate blow where they may. Andre Moreau(Stewart Granger) will strike a blow for vengeance and the French Revolution. First he must hone his skill with the blade. By day Andre secretly perfects his parries and lunges - and hides his true identity at night behind the mask of stage clown Scaramouche. A climactic duel that's one of the greatest sequences ever to lay steel to foe caps this bravura adaptation of the Rafael Sabatini novel. George Sidney nimbly directs all the swordplay wordplay and horseplay. Also featuring: Eleanor Parker, Janet Leigh and Mel Ferrer. En garde! Enjoy the movie!
| File list not available. |
Hammer71 at 2008-10-10 07:23 CET:
Thanks for this movie!
This is a great movie.
This is a great movie.
thanks mate.
Does anyone have this not pan and scanned? As grateful as I am to have this film at all, I'd prefer to watch it in its original 1.37:1 ratio instead of cropped to 4:3, especially since both my monitor and TV are widescreen.
Yes, I am aware that it's not much of a difference between 1.37 and 1.33, but it's the principle of the thing. Why is it acceptable to freely modify director's works but not paintings or other art forms? Would you chop off part of the Mona Lisa because it didn't fit the frame you bought for it? Would you have off David's head because he didn't fit through your door?
Yes, I am aware that it's not much of a difference between 1.37 and 1.33, but it's the principle of the thing. Why is it acceptable to freely modify director's works but not paintings or other art forms? Would you chop off part of the Mona Lisa because it didn't fit the frame you bought for it? Would you have off David's head because he didn't fit through your door?
Thank you!
Comments